CAPTURING · UNSTRUCTURED
DECISION GRAPH · LIVE
ENGINE · RULES-V5 · BITEMPORAL
PHASE 1 / 7
The decision-intelligence layer for institutions

The context graph
that writes itself.

Every claim, quote and renewal is a decision. G-Nosis remembers the reasoning behind each one — turning an insurer's everyday calls into faster, more consistent, more defensible ones. Value that compounds with every file.

The Problem

Siloed.
Fragmented.
Indefensible.

Trading systems, claims platforms, deal rooms, risk models, Slack threads, board memos. The reasoning behind every decision your institution has made is scattered across systems no two people read the same way — and gone the moment the person who made it leaves.

87% OF DECISION CONTEXT · NEVER QUERIED AGAIN
Ground It in Decisions

Until you give it
a memory.

G-Nosis binds every fragment to the decision it justified. Proposals, rules, approvals, exceptions, precedents, outcomes — first-class events on an append-only, bitemporal log. Scattered files become an institutional mind your people can reason over.

SEMANTIC ACCESS · 27 EDGE TYPES · BITEMPORAL
WORKED EXAMPLE · CLM-4471 · 09:14 GMT

A decision is
on the desk.

A customer has dropped and shattered a scheduled luxury watch. The examiner must decide quantum and coverage — and deciding it cold risks diverging from how the firm settled the same facts last year.

CLM-4471 Valuables · accidental damage · quantum + coverage OPEN · 4M AGO
WORDING-22 · v5 · BOUND

The reasoning,
captured in real time.

The engine binds the in-force WORDING-V5 §accidental-damage and the claims-handling guideline that applies. Each step is pinned to wording version, transaction time and valid time — not reconstructed later from an adjuster's file note.

WORDING-22 Accidental damage · scheduled item at loss date BOUND 09:14:02
GUIDE-07 Quantum band · valuables valuation guideline EVALUATED
CLM-2208 · ADJUDICATED MAR 2025

A precedent
is the book
remembering itself.

Fourteen months ago, another team settled a comparable valuables loss on the same coverage trigger — same wording version, same quantum band. The trace surfaces it before the examiner asks, and flags the moment this decision would diverge from it.

CLM-2208 Comparable valuables · settlement upheld on review CITED · SEALED
CONSISTENCY Within band · divergence flagged if not DEFENSIBLE
The compounding loop

Today's decisions become
tomorrow's precedent.

Every precedent is fed back in as context for the next decision — and every decision becomes the next precedent. The graph compounds with each call, not each user. That loop is the moat no read-path tool can copy.

SCROLL TO TRAVERSE
27
Typed edge
relationships · v5
100%
Of decisions captured
on the write path
2×
Time dimensions ·
bitemporal by schema
0
Customer records used
to train any model
In private deployment with institutional partners · references under NDA
SOC 2 Type II · IN AUDIT EU AI Act · ALIGNED Single-tenant · BYOK
From a G-Nosis client
We stopped re-deciding things we had already decided. The trace surfaces our own precedent before anyone asks — and every call we make is defensible the moment it’s made.
Kyle Baird Founder, Collective Insurance
Collective Insurance · G-Nosis client since 2024
Why G-Nosis

Everyone else reads
your past. We write it.

The market is full of tools that index your documents and answer questions about them. They get smarter when your people ask better queries — the institution itself learns nothing. G-Nosis is the opposite kind of system.

Read-path · the incumbents

Search over what already exists

  • Indexes documents, filings and notes you already wrote
  • Answers a question, then forgets it was ever asked
  • Improves with query volume, not with your decisions
  • Hands back what you put in — nothing compounds
Catalogs · RAG wrappers · copilots · vector search
Write-path · G-Nosis

A new edge every time a decision fires

  • Records the reasoning, rule and precedent behind each call
  • Binds it bitemporally — what was true, and when you knew it
  • Improves with every decision, not every user
  • The graph gets denser; the firm gets harder to replace
The decision system of record
The answer to "why you, not the incumbent"

Your graph is your moat
not a vendor's training set.

01

You own the graph

Your manuscripts, models and precedent stay in your tenant. The data that makes your decisions defensible is the same data that makes you competitive — it never leaves, and never trains anyone's model.

vs. shared catalogs & multi-tenant indexes
02

Not hostage to one model

G-Nosis is the substrate, not the model. Your decision infrastructure is not locked to any single frontier model's pricing, deprecation schedule or roadmap. Swap the engine; keep the graph.

vs. platforms welded to one provider
03

The audit is built in

Every event already carries transaction time, valid time, schema version, actor and source. You are not bolting on explainability — the trace is the system. Defensible by construction.

vs. explainability added after the fact
One substrate · many decisions

The same shape, wherever
decisions get made.

Index & portfolio actions Claims precedent & consistency Reinsurance treaty renewal Credit & covenant memos Investment committee decisions Underwriting & reserving Model risk & governance
Stop losing your institutional memory

Every decision.
Every rule. Every precedent.

G-Nosis is the decision-intelligence layer for institutions — on infrastructure you own, independent of any single model. We work with firms that want to design the decision schema they preserve, not buy a black box that forgets.